Feed on
Posts
Comments

Archive for the 'Safety Measurement' Category

Greetings recording this podcast on the road in ST. Agatha, Maine. This week I would like to share with you an article recently written by Terry and published on the 22nd of September 2009 in Workplace HR and Safety’s Safety Email Report. If you would like to see a hard copy of this article please visit www.ProActSafety.com and click on insights. After you are finished listening to this podcast you will hear that I will close a little differently.

 

I would like you to consider this, if you only have time to do one thing in safety today, what would it be and how will it contribute to making this a safer world for us all? Thanks for tuning in…

 

Shawn Galloway

ProAct Safety

 

Listen Now:


icon for podbean  Standard Podcasts [8:20m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (309)

Read Full Post »

Greetings, this podcast recorded in East Brunswick, New Jersey. Last week Terry and I talked about the four (4) part model, FILM – Focus, Influence, Listen and Measure. If you haven’t listened to last week’s podcast I highly encourage you to go back and do so first, prior to continuing with this topic as this one builds on last week’s model. This week we sat down and discussed the four primary factors that influence risk taking.  I hope you will be able to find a way to apply these models to your organization. If you need any assistance, please feel free to contact us. All of our contact information can be found at www.ProActSafety.com

 

This audio file can be found at www.SafetyCultureExcellence.com

 

Have a great week!

 

Shawn M. Galloway

ProAct Safety, Inc.

 

Listen Now:


icon for podbean  Standard Podcasts [17:41m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (156)

Read Full Post »

Greetings, this podcast recorded in Canton, Ohio. This week Terry and I would like to share with you an advanced model for improving safety. This is a model that has helped hundreds of international organizations advance beyond traditional safety, to reach and sustain a level of excellence in safety. First, I would like to challenge you with something. As you will hear how this four part model applies to safety, consider the impact this would have on other operational performance areas such as quality, on-time delivery, productivity and others.  If you would like a graph of this in a PowerPoint slide, please email us at podcast @ proactsafety.com.

 

In next week’s podcast we will expand on this topic by discussing a follow-up model that sheds light on the four primary factors that influence risk taking. Thank you for tuning in each week and remember these topics come from the questions we receive while on assignment and from you the listeners. So, keep them coming! 

 

Have a great week!

 

Shawn M. Galloway

ProAct Safety, Inc.

Listen Now:


icon for podbean  Standard Podcasts [20:14m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (128)

Read Full Post »

Greetings, recording this week in Marysville, Kansas. Just a quick note about some upcoming public events: On the 15th and 16th of September Terry Mathis will be in Seattle, Washington leading two one-day public sessions that are part of the Safety Culture Excellence Series. On the 15th he will be leading a seminar titled Advanced Tactics for Behavior-Based Safety: Lean Principles & Results Orientation. The following day will be covering Leadership Safety Coaching: Teach Your Supervisors to be Safety Coaches. 

Then on the 28th and 29th of September I will be conducting two one day workshops for the Saskatchewan Section of American Society of Quality. Each One-Day Workshop is titled: Lean Behaviour-Based Safety & Safety Culture Excellence. If you would like more information about these workshops or other upcoming events, please visit www.ProActSafety.com and click on the events category at the top.

So on to this week’s topic. “Most people view perceptions as something to be measured; not managed. But I have found that if perceptions are not managed, they will have variance that can cause lack of correct focus in safety efforts. Workers who do not accurately perceive their greatest risks often waste their limited safety efforts on ineffective strategies. Correcting perceptions can direct safety efforts for maximum effectiveness.” – Terry Mathis.

 In the June 2009 edition of EHS Today, Terry Mathis, the Founder and CEO of our firm ProAct Safety, published an article that has created quite a buzz among safety professionals and executive leaders. For this week, I’d like to share a recording of that article and challenge you to consider if the message applies to your company. If you would like to see the actual article, please visit EHS Today’s website at www.EHSToday.com or you can find it along with a lot of other free content to improve your safety focus on our website at www.proactsafety.com. So without further delay, let’s get to the article…

 Thanks and have a great week!

Shawn Galloway

ProAct Safety

Listen Now:


icon for podbean  Standard Podcasts [13:32m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (401)

Read Full Post »

Welcome everyone recording in The Woodlands, Texas. For this week’s topic I wanted to share with you a recently recorded interview with the two presenters of an upcoming talk at National Safety Council’s 2009 Conference in Orlando Florida. Terry Mathis of our firm ProAct Safety and Rudy Hagen of Georgia-Pacific, LLC will be co presenting a case study titled Measuring Safety Culture at Georgia-Pacific:  Methods, Findings, & Results

The talk will take place on the 26th of October 2009 in the 1:30 time slot.

 

Terry and Rudy will discuss how several Georgia-Pacific sites encountered cultural issues that did not respond to tools that had been successful at other sites.  To address this, Georgia-Pacific partnered with ProAct Safety and developed entirely new tools and processes to measure for safety excellence.  This new analysis helped to identify problems that were not apparent in audits or perception surveys. By attending this live case study discussion you will learn the methodology, findings, corrective steps, and the impact they had on safety results at these sites.  So without further delay, let’s listen in to the recorded interview…

 

Have a great week!

 

Shawn Galloway

ProAct Safety

Listen Now:


icon for podbean  Standard Podcasts [17:52m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (112)

Read Full Post »

Greetings, recording this week in Saratoga, New York. For the podcast this week, Terry and I answer the following client’s question: “We had a Steering Team meeting last week and a concern about data analysis was raised and I have an action item to contact you for your thoughts. During our previous data analysis the least percent safe days of the week were Thursday and Friday, and the least percent safe times were between 6 am and 9 am. So as a Steering Team, we communicated this and tried to target observations during those days and times.  During this past data analysis, the least percent Safe days were Sunday, Monday, Tuesday and the least percent safe time was 1 pm. So this is where we are focusing our observations.

Is the improvement due to our target observations or is this something that will always be a moving target? Or does it even matter as long as we are communicating?” – Kelly

 

Thanks Kelly, before we get into the recording, just a quick announcement I’ll be at the Incident Prevention Conference in Louisville, Kentucky the week of 04 October 2009 and Terry and I both will be at the National Safety Council’s Conference in Orlando the week of 25 October 2009. If you happen to be at either or both, please stop by our booth or one of our talks and say hello. So without further delay, let’s jump right into the discussion.

 

I hope you enjoy this week’s recording!

 

Shawn Galloway

ProAct Safety

Listen Now:


icon for podbean  Standard Podcasts [11:54m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (436)

Read Full Post »

Greetings recording this week in Omaha, NE.  “In the early 1980s many safety professionals were excited about the possibilities of using new advances in the behavioral sciences to improve organizational safety. Among the technologies being investigated was the idea of behavioral observation. Behavior is by definition “an observable act” and therefore measurable by workplace observation. If a statistically-significant connection could be made between certain behaviors and accident probabilities, measuring these behaviors through observation might provide a more accurate measurement of workplace safety.” – Terry Mathis

 

In the May 2009 edition of Industrial Engineer, another one of Terry’s articles was published. We received some great feedback from the article, including a request to record it here for the subscribers of Safety Culture Excellence. So the podcast this week is a reading of the recent article “Hard Measurements for Soft Science: Behavior-Based Safety Has Evolved” by Terry Mathis. If you would like to see the actual article please visit either the Industrial Engineer Magazine website at www.iienet2.org or our website at www.ProActSafety.com and click on the Insights tab.

 

If you are interested in a behavioral approach to operational improvement this article will definitely provide a better understanding. So here we go…

 

Thanks and have a great week!

 

Shawn Galloway

ProAct Safety

Listen Now:


icon for podbean  Standard Podcasts [22:50m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (464)

Read Full Post »

Greetings from Omaha, NE. I received a great post on my Facebook page a couple of weeks back. I responded to it in text format only on this podcast’s blog site. Subsequently, I’ve had a few requests to turn it into a recording. So, always happy to oblige that is what I’ll be doing for this week’s topic which I’m calling: Is Your Safety Focus Out Of Touch With Reality? As you listen to this recording, please reflect on what you are focusing on in safety and how it either helps or hurts your efforts to reach and sustain a level of excellence and create the ownership necessary for people to be safe, regardless of where they are in world. 

 

Here is what I received on my Facebook page…

 

“I’m familiar with safety consultants.  Some of my best friends are Safety Directors or Regional Safety Managers.  I guess since I had a good buddy fall to his death on a project and witnessed three fatalities on another project I have developed some passion for doing the work right which also means safely.  I’m always a little entertained by safety ignorance especially at the program level where you report the stupid things that produce metrics, but lets you fly under the wire so the managers don’t get all riled up.  I’ve witnessed a safety professional ask a crane operator to wear his safety glasses while operating with a 80–foot long shaft cage being lowered into place not 4-feet from an operating emergency room.  The whole time I’m striving for operational excellence I frequently witness some safety knuckle head locking horns with an hourly meathead over PPE or something that’s pretty insignificant.  Please explain that culture if you can.  I’m all ears.” - Todd

 

Great comment Todd and thank you! This is a common headache and I agree unfortunately many workers feel that safety is out of touch with the reality of the risks of the job. Some could argue it is because some safety professionals aren’t always familiar with the industry or the way that work is performed. Others unfortunately view safety professionals as the safety police rather than a resource to the job site superintendents or foremen to ensure the work can occur as safe as possible.

 

I often find there is good intention; the biggest issue I find is there is just not enough attention placed on really talking with the people who perform the work and truly understanding the inherent risks.  Moreover many times the accident investigation following an event becomes a form filling process rather than truly understanding all the contributing factors and influencers.  So with the best of intentions the engineering hierarchy of controls is used and thus Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) becomes a perceived easy fix. Realistically there are still some managers will only support easy to fix issues, or the easiest mitigation opportunity. Sometimes the easiest is not the most risk reducing.

 

Now consider that all risks cannot be removed in an organization. It is impossible to engineer all danger out so too often PPE becomes a focal point; moreover it is easiest to spot. Plus in some people’s minds it is an easy way to demonstrate that safety is important because it is being enforced. Rather than coaching for safety performance it is easier to manage for compliance. If we are truthful with ourselves we are all susceptible to that.   We are hardwired in the brain to look for exception and manage that exception.  Too often I’ve found an example of that is when someone asks why the requirement is necessary, the response is “because it is a rule”. Rather than explaining the rationale and allowing the workers to discovery learn how this minimizes exposure to risk if there is validity to the rule or discretional request. I’ve also seen examples where the individual enforcing the mandatory behavior, themselves doesn’t understand. When this happens safety becomes a joke.  Management and supervision becomes aligned with the workers and the jokes on the safety person.

 

I work very hard to ensure safety isn’t driven by extrinsic motivators; it has to be intrinsic at all levels to reach excellence. When it is extrinsic, (pushed by someone to do something for safety that doesn’t make sense) safety becomes “because I have to” rather than “because I want to.” Additionally too often PPE policies are blanket responses to a single event or one person’s undesirable behavior. This often occurs because the ability or comfort level to coach for performance and give helpful feedback is nonexistent. After working at countless locations throughout the world, I’ve found it isn’t only some safety professionals who are guilty of this. It is often many other leaders that fall into this trap.

 

Regarding metrics, unfortunately we measure often because we have to rather than to gather insight. Thus we fall prey to measurement dysfunction. I agree that PPE is far, far too often the predominant focus of safety improvement. Rather than understanding the job, the risks and the experience of the people doing the work. WE need to involve them to help us collectively understand how to collaboratively improve safety at the job site and everywhere the people are. In other words, the tools in safety should not be solely requirement-based or reside in a gang box (construction site toolbox) at the jobsite. We have to be passionate about improving; otherwise the strong safety foundation we create will crumble under the pressure of other hypercompetitive operational priorities. I believe individual passion at all levels is the only thing that will truly sustain the foundation we work hard to create.  Passion for safety cannot be forced upon an individual.

 

To get to the level of excellence, those of us trying to help improve safety can’t be only focusing on the easy to see opportunities like PPE; we have to go deeper in the organizational culture to understand the influencers and hidden risks that we miss, even with our own common sense and experience. We have to go to the people who know the jobs and risks best, the people doing the work.  Even if we are passionate about improving safety and have had successes in the past, we can’t be naïve and only leverage only our viewpoint of risk. Sadly in the way we measure, assess and “manage” safety, we often can’t see the hidden things.

 

It is analogous to telling someone there is fish in the lake you used to fish in as a kid. Standing on the pier a disbelieving individual looks out across the surface and replies, “no there isn’t”. They then dip an empty bucket below the surface, retrieve it and stare at the bucket now full of lake water and reply, “see!” 

 

 

Shawn M. Galloway

President and Chief Operating Officer

ProAct Safety, Inc.

Listen Now:


icon for podbean  Standard Podcasts [7:51m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (425)

Read Full Post »

Greetings from Canton, Ohio. Whenever we are called in to audit an existing observation or behavioral safety (Behavior-Based) approach, we always ask a lot of questions but we often start with three simple ones.

  1. What are you focusing on?
  2. Do people know what the focus is?
  3. How does that impact your accident rates?

Key thought here, if you have a focus in safety like items on a checklist, if people haven’t internalized the items or the focus, you will always be relying on observations and reminders. That shouldn’t be the goal in a Behavior-Based Safety process or any other awareness or focus initiative. I believe the goal should be to give people a few key things that they can do to minimize their exposure to risk and help them internalize them and remove the obstacles or barriers that make it difficult or impossible to take those precautions. So for this week’s podcast Terry and will talk about what we call Knowledge of Precautions in Behavior-Based Safety.

Have a great week!

Shawn Galloway ProAct Safety

Listen Now:


icon for podbean  Standard Podcasts [12:03m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (494)

Read Full Post »

Greetings from: Toronto, Ontario. When we talk about safety excellence we are often talking about doing something fundamentally different than what we have already done before. Consider that most advanced approaches to excellence will not work, either initially or sustain if you do not have a good management foundation already in place. Similarly in safety, if you are not doing the basics, if you do not have a great safety toolbox already in place, adding another tool will be sometimes pointless. Moreover attempting something you are not ready for and failing, almost always creates barriers to future attempts. Many sites realize that doing more of the same doesn’t always bring change. I think Drucker said it best, “Success always makes obsolete the very behavior that achieved it.”  I believe to begin a path towards excellence you need to understand the limitations of traditional safety. Thomas Edison believed that “Discontent is the first necessity of progress.” I believe this to be true,  so Terry and I sat down and discussed our thoughts on this topic. I hope it provides you some ideas to start strengthening the foundations of your management systems and prepare you for any advanced initiatives you may be considering!

 

Have a great week!

 

Shawn Galloway

ProAct Safety

Listen Now:


icon for podbean  Standard Podcasts [36:16m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download | Embeddable Player | Hits (438)

Read Full Post »

- Next »