Episodes

Wednesday Nov 27, 2013
Leading vs. Lagging Indicators in Safety
Wednesday Nov 27, 2013
Wednesday Nov 27, 2013
As more and more leaders and safety professionals realize the limitations of reactive safety, they search for leading indicators to help them manage safety more proactively. This thinking fueled the concept that lagging indicators alone, are not truly representative of safety performance, nor are they predictive or prescriptive.
The first round of so-called “leading indicators” was little more than a measurement of safety-related activities: hours of safety training, attendance at safety meetings, participation in safety programs, etc. OSHA’s crackdown on incentives that could potentially suppress reporting of accidents drove many organizations to base their incentives on these activity metrics rather than simply not having an accident.
When behavior-based safety became the rage, the measurement of behaviors from observations came to be thought of as a leading indicator. As safety culture became a buzz phrase, perception surveys gained in popularity and came to be considered another potential leading indicator. The search for meaningful leading indicators goes on because no one of these has proven adequate in predicting and preventing injuries.
Where none of these alone succeed, all of them together potentially can. A balanced-scorecard approach in which the metrics not only complement, but predict each other has proven quite effective in proactively predicting how to prevent accidents. When you measure how much activity it takes to change perceptions, how much of a change in perceptions it takes to change behaviors, and how much behavior change it takes to change the lagging indicators, you begin to truly measure the effectiveness of safety efforts. Just as balanced scorecards have revolutionized strategic management, with our most successful clients, balanced scorecards for safety have proven to have a transformational impact on safety management. How balanced are your measurements?
-Terry L. Mathis
Terry L. Mathis is the founder and CEO of ProAct Safety, an international safety and performance excellence firm. He is known for his dynamic presentations in the fields of behavioral and cultural safety, leadership, and operational performance, and is a regular speaker at ASSE, NSC, and numerous company and industry conferences. EHS Today listed Terry as a Safety Guru in ‘The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS in 2010, 2011 and 2012-2013. He has been a frequent contributor to industry magazines for over 15 years and is the coauthor of STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence, 2013, WILEY.

Monday Nov 25, 2013
317 - Licensing and Royalty Fees Can Blunt Safety Advances
Monday Nov 25, 2013
Monday Nov 25, 2013
Greetings everyone, this podcast recorded while in Fredericksburg, TX. I’d like to share an article I wrote, published September 2013 in ISHN Magazine. The published article can either be found on the magazine’s website or under Insights at www.ProActSafety.com.
I hope you enjoy the podcast this week. If you would like to download or play on demand our other podcasts, please visit the ProAct Safety’s podcast website at: http://www.safetycultureexcellence.com. If you would like access to archived podcasts (older than 90 days – dating back to January 2008) please visit www.ProActSafety.com/Store. For more detailed strategies to achieve and sustain excellence in performance and culture, pick up a copy of our book, STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence - http://proactsafety.com/insights/steps-to-safety-culture-excellence
Have a great week!
Shawn M. Galloway
ProAct Safety

Wednesday Nov 20, 2013
Can You Do Too Much Safety Training?
Wednesday Nov 20, 2013
Wednesday Nov 20, 2013
This is a follow-up to a previous blog that can be accessed here: http://www.safetycultureexcellence.com/2013/09/18/more-is-not-better-only-better-is-better/
There seems to be naïve assumption that if training does solve a problem the answer is more training. It is NOT! The answer is better training. Overtraining is a serious problem in the safety programs of several industries. Workers are literally bombarded with information that is not sticky. They leave training sessions confused instead of enlightened. They feel like they are trying to drink from a fire hose.
One problem is that training is designed to limit legal exposure rather than effectively improve safety. New employee orientation on project jobsites is often a massive information dump, rather than a focused effort to eliminate the most common safety challenges. In fact, most safety training takes a blanket vs. a focused approach. The training tries to cover every possible risk rather than focusing on the risks that have historically caused the most injuries.
Blanket-type training is notoriously non-memorable. Effective training creates awareness that is sticky, (easy to remember) so that workers can easily carry the knowledge in their memory until it becomes habitual. Test or ask your trainees if they can recite from training what they should do to improve safety. Ask them again a week or a month after training. If they can’t remember, the problem lies in the quality, not the quantity of training.
-Terry L. Mathis
Terry L. Mathis is the founder and CEO of ProAct Safety, an international safety and performance excellence firm. He is known for his dynamic presentations in the fields of behavioral and cultural safety, leadership, and operational performance, and is a regular speaker at ASSE, NSC, and numerous company and industry conferences. EHS Today listed Terry as a Safety Guru in ‘The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS in 2010, 2011 and 2012-2013. He has been a frequent contributor to industry magazines for over 15 years and is the coauthor of STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence, 2013, WILEY.

Monday Nov 18, 2013
316 - Mergers and Acquisitions: Aligning Your Next Culture
Monday Nov 18, 2013
Monday Nov 18, 2013
Greetings everyone, this podcast recorded while in Craig, CO. I’d like to share an article I wrote, published September 2013 in BIC Magazine. The published article can either be found on the magazine’s website or under Insights at www.ProActSafety.com.
I hope you enjoy the podcast this week. If you would like to download or play on demand our other podcasts, please visit the ProAct Safety’s podcast website at: http://www.safetycultureexcellence.com. If you would like access to archived podcasts (older than 90 days – dating back to January 2008) please visit www.ProActSafety.com/Store. For more detailed strategies to achieve and sustain excellence in performance and culture, pick up a copy of our book, STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence - http://proactsafety.com/insights/steps-to-safety-culture-excellence
Have a great week!
Shawn M. Galloway
ProAct Safety

Wednesday Nov 13, 2013
Focus and Scan
Wednesday Nov 13, 2013
Wednesday Nov 13, 2013
When you drive down the highway your eyes perform two distinct, but related functions. You look at the entire roadway in front of you (scan) and you often glance at the stripes that line your position on the highway (focus). Both of these functions are crucial to safe driving. You need to know the entire path you are traveling, but also need to stay within your land to avoid other vehicles.
Most safety programs have a scan but lack a focus. Workers are admonished to “be careful” and “think before you act” but are not focused on specific improvement targets. Safety improvement is an elephant that must be eaten a bite at a time. Scanning may maintain the status quo, but it will not lead to significant improvement.
The best-performing organizations in safety constantly target specific improvements while maintaining the emphasis on the big picture. Workers are careful but also focused on specific improvement targets that can be transformational for the organization. Safety cultures form around their ability to solve safety problems and move on to other targets. They become a “can do” culture and thrive on conquering specific safety challenges. Excellence is not one-dimensional. It is a combination of scanning for all risks while focusing on overcoming specific risks. The journey to safety excellence is taken a step at a time and these steps are the focus that complement the scanning of the road ahead.
-Terry L. Mathis
Terry L. Mathis is the founder and CEO of ProAct Safety, an international safety and performance excellence firm. He is known for his dynamic presentations in the fields of behavioral and cultural safety, leadership, and operational performance, and is a regular speaker at ASSE, NSC, and numerous company and industry conferences. EHS Today listed Terry as a Safety Guru in ‘The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS in 2010, 2011 and 2012-2013. He has been a frequent contributor to industry magazines for over 15 years and is the coauthor of STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence, 2013, WILEY.

Monday Nov 04, 2013
314 - Competitive Safety: Breaking the Mold
Monday Nov 04, 2013
Monday Nov 04, 2013
Greetings everyone, this podcast recorded while in Austin, TX. I’d like to share an article written by Terry L. Mathis, published August 2013 in EHS Today Magazine. The published article can either be found on the magazine’s website or under Insights at www.ProActSafety.com.
I hope you enjoy the podcast this week. If you would like to download or play on demand our other podcasts, please visit the ProAct Safety’s podcast website at: http://www.safetycultureexcellence.com. If you would like access to archived podcasts (older than 90 days – dating back to January 2008) please visit www.ProActSafety.com/Store. For more detailed strategies to achieve and sustain excellence in performance and culture, pick up a copy of our book, STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence - http://proactsafety.com/insights/steps-to-safety-culture-excellence
Have a great week!
Shawn M. Galloway
ProAct Safety

Wednesday Oct 30, 2013
Little Things: The Biggest Things in Safety
Wednesday Oct 30, 2013
Wednesday Oct 30, 2013
It is logical to begin a safety effort by addressing the risks with the greatest probability for causing injuries and the highest severity potential. However, it is imperative that when the greater risks are addressed that the next ones in line get the new focus. If an organization ever develops the mindset that they have handled the big things and all that is left are little things, not worth the bother, this is a formula for disaster. Many rude wake-up calls have come via a rash of accidents caused by these “little things.”
Accidents are, after all, ambushes. If we saw them coming we would have avoided them. So it logically follows that anything we don’t keep our eyes on has the potential of ambushing us. Some experts suggest that workers get injured when they fail to recognize the risk. But underestimating the risk is equally dangerous.
Many have adopted a goal or vision of “zero injuries.” If properly explained and implemented, such a goal can keep organizations continuously addressing smaller risks as they successfully eliminate or manage larger ones. When accident rates go down, the effort does not stop; it simply refocuses itself on the next tier of risks. True excellence in safety is quite different from simply pretty good. No risk should ever be considered a “little thing.”
-Terry L. Mathis
Terry L. Mathis is the founder and CEO of ProAct Safety, an international safety and performance excellence firm. He is known for his dynamic presentations in the fields of behavioral and cultural safety, leadership, and operational performance, and is a regular speaker at ASSE, NSC, and numerous company and industry conferences. EHS Today listed Terry as a Safety Guru in ‘The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS in 2010, 2011 and 2012-2013. He has been a frequent contributor to industry magazines for over 15 years and is the coauthor of STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence, 2013, WILEY.

Monday Oct 28, 2013
313 - Who Should Develop Corporate Safety Strategy?
Monday Oct 28, 2013
Monday Oct 28, 2013
Greetings everyone, this podcast recorded while in Covington, KY. I’d like to share an article I wrote, published August 2013 in OH&S Magazine. The published article can either be found on the magazine’s website or under Insights at www.ProActSafety.com.
I hope you enjoy the podcast this week. If you would like to download or play on demand our other podcasts, please visit the ProAct Safety’s podcast website at: http://www.safetycultureexcellence.com. If you would like access to archived podcasts (older than 90 days – dating back to January 2008) please visit www.ProActSafety.com/Store. For more detailed strategies to achieve and sustain excellence in performance and culture, pick up a copy of our book, STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence - http://proactsafety.com/insights/steps-to-safety-culture-excellence
Have a great week!
Shawn M. Galloway
ProAct Safety

Monday Oct 21, 2013
312 – Who Really Owns Safety?
Monday Oct 21, 2013
Monday Oct 21, 2013
Greetings everyone, this podcast recorded while in Bethesda, MD. I’d like to share an article I wrote, published August 2013 in ISHN Magazine. The published article can either be found on the magazine’s website or under Insights at www.ProActSafety.com.
I hope you enjoy the podcast this week. If you would like to download or play on demand our other podcasts, please visit the ProAct Safety’s podcast website at: http://www.safetycultureexcellence.com. If you would like access to archived podcasts (older than 90 days – dating back to January 2008) please visit www.ProActSafety.com/Store. For more detailed strategies to achieve and sustain excellence in performance and culture, pick up a copy of our book, STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence - http://proactsafety.com/insights/steps-to-safety-culture-excellence
Have a great week!
Shawn M. Galloway
ProAct Safety

Friday Oct 18, 2013
Misunderstanding Hazards and Risks
Friday Oct 18, 2013
Friday Oct 18, 2013
I heard a good analogy recently about the difference between hazards and risks. “Hazards are the sharks you spot in ocean while standing on the shore. They become Risks when you get in the water.” How well do you help those you lead, understand, identify, and respond to the differences?
With good intentions, many organizations prompt activities to purposefully and proactively identify potential hazards in the workplace. While this is admirable, it becomes a complex issue when there isn’t a shared understanding of what a hazard is and isn’t, and how some turn into risk. But, not all risk will turn into incidents and injuries. Further, if there is a shared belief that “safe means zero risk and safety first”, or “safety is our number one priority”; might there be mixed signals sent?
Consider how this might be interpreted, “They say our goal is zero injuries and zero risks and that ‘safety first’ means we are controlling all the risks, yet we have brought several to management’s attention with no action!” This isn’t just hyperbole, this misunderstanding was the result of a conversation with a key union official within a client organization.
Let’s provide some further context on hazards and risk. Wikipedia provides a good definition of hazard. “A hazard is a situation that poses a level of threat to life, health, property, or environment. Most hazards are dormant or potential, with only a theoretical risk of harm; however, once a hazard becomes "active", it can create an emergency situation. A hazardous situation that has come to pass is called an incident. Hazard and possibility interact together to create risk.” Note the key points in this, “most hazards are… only a theoretical risk of harm; however, once a hazard becomes ‘active’…”
A further search in Wikipedia provides another good explanation of risk. “Risk is the potential of loss (an undesirable outcome, however not necessarily so) resulting from a given action, activity and/or inaction. The notion implies that a choice having an influence on the outcome sometimes exists (or existed). Potential losses themselves may also be called "risks". Any human endeavor carries some risk, but some are much riskier than others.” Again, some key points to tease out: “Risk is the potential of loss… resulting from a given action”. Moreover, it points out “Any human endeavor carries some risk…”
Some safety advocates propose there is little point in debating terminology. I strongly disagree. How common language is used influences beliefs and behaviors within the culture. The English language has many different meanings for the same word. Have you ever used a word or phrase that was interpreted incorrectly? Of course you have. You know how important it is to use the correct words when communicating with your family. Why should our dialogue within safety be less important? After all, isn’t it our number one priority? Or wait, is it a core value?
- Shawn M. Galloway
Here is a short video on this topic: http://youtu.be/_BrpiL4rxgk
Shawn M. Galloway is the President of ProAct Safety and the coauthor of two books, his latest published Feb 2013 by Wiley is STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence. As an internationally recognized safety excellence expert, he has helped hundreds of organizations within every major industry to achieve and sustain excellence in performance and culture. He has been listed in this year’s National Safety Council Top 40 Rising Stars, EHS Today Magazine’s 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS and ISHN Magazine’s POWER 101 – Leaders of the EHS World and again in the recent, elite list of Up and Coming Thought Leaders. In addition to the books, Shawn has authored over 300 podcasts, 100 articles and 80 videos on the subject of safety excellence in culture and performance.