Episodes

Friday Aug 23, 2013
Safety’s “Usual Suspects”
Friday Aug 23, 2013
Friday Aug 23, 2013
In the classic movie, Casablanca, whenever a crime took place the police gathered up the “usual suspects” to show that they were taking action. The usual suspects regularly got blamed but were seldom the true guilty parties. At the end of the movie, even when they were sure of who committed the crime, they simply went through the motions to satisfy those in control...Investigating industrial accidents can fall into the same trap of substituting action for results.
When reading over a recent set of accident investigation forms, I was alarmed at the cut-and-paste wording that seemed to repeat in so many of them. Corrective actions almost always were the same: either change a condition or blame an individual by imposing discipline or retraining. There were no influences or barriers mentioned. It was as if all accidents were caused strictly by conditions or negligence.
Theoretically, neither a condition nor a behavior can be a true “root cause” since they are both caused or influenced by other factors. Conditions don’t cause themselves and behaviors are not always simply the choice of the individual involved. All this emphasizes the need to ask the question “Why?” when investigating accidents. Why was there an oil spill on the floor? Why did you use pliers instead of a wrench? Without getting to the underlying causes we tend to take the easy action of fixing the blame on the usual suspects instead of truly fixing the problem.
-Terry L. Mathis
Terry L. Mathis is the founder and CEO of ProAct Safety, an international safety and performance excellence firm. He is known for his dynamic presentations in the fields of behavioral and cultural safety, leadership, and operational performance, and is a regular speaker at ASSE, NSC, and numerous company and industry conferences. EHS Today listed Terry as a Safety Guru in ‘The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS in 2010, 2011 and 2012-2013. He has been a frequent contributor to industry magazines for over 15 years and is the coauthor of STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence, 2013, WILEY.

Monday Aug 19, 2013
303 - Safety leadership happens in the middle
Monday Aug 19, 2013
Monday Aug 19, 2013
Greetings everyone, this podcast recorded while in Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin. I’d like to share an article I wrote, published May 2013 in BIC Magazine. It was titled, Safety leadership happens in the middle. The published article can either be found on the magazine’s website or under Insights at www.ProActSafety.com. I hope you enjoy the podcast this week. If you would like to download or play on demand our other podcasts, please visit the ProAct Safety’s podcast website at: http://www.safetycultureexcellence.com. If you would like access to archived podcasts (older than 90 days – dating back to January 2008) please visit www.ProActSafety.com/Store. For more detailed strategies to achieve and sustain excellence in performance and culture, pick up a copy of our book, STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence - http://proactsafety.com/insights/steps-to-safety-culture-excellence Have a great week! Shawn M. Galloway ProAct Safety, Inc

Wednesday Aug 14, 2013
Creating a Sense of Urgency
Wednesday Aug 14, 2013
Wednesday Aug 14, 2013
For many years business strategists suggested that cultures benefited from what they called “Positive Urgency.” Experimentation and research had shown that a sense of urgency caused otherwise complacent workers to rally around a cause and produce higher levels of action toward goals. To accomplish this end, leaders were urged to create artificial emergencies to challenge workers. These were called “burning platforms” and were designed to produce stress and a sense of crisis.
Slowly leaders and their experts realized that what people really do on burning platforms is to escape, not solve problems. They also do not continue their emergency behaviors after the emergency is over. A sense of urgency only creates a culture change if it is sustained over time and does not kill the members with stress before they change. The experts are now calling for more lasting and important and less urgent and artificial stimuli to create the desired sense of urgency.
In safety, it has historically been tragic accidents or bad trends in accident frequency that have caused us to become positively urgent. We react to disasters in safety as we do in business, by rallying and taking significant action. However, just like in business, when the severity and/or frequency goes away so does the increased action. The challenge in safety is to find these long-lasting reasons for significant action even when accidents are not providing them. This is the way to proactive excellence.
In business, they have turned to building a sense of identity, not just action. What will the organization be remembered for and is it important? Safety must find its own identity also. What does this safety culture seek to become and does that identity inspire significant action toward excellence? The answer may be different for different organizations, but the right answers will not be found unless the right questions are asked.
-Terry L. Mathis
Terry L. Mathis is the founder and CEO of ProAct Safety, an international safety and performance excellence firm. He is known for his dynamic presentations in the fields of behavioral and cultural safety, leadership, and operational performance, and is a regular speaker at ASSE, NSC, and numerous company and industry conferences. EHS Today listed Terry as a Safety Guru in ‘The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS in 2010, 2011 and 2012-2013. He has been a frequent contributor to industry magazines for over 15 years and is the coauthor of STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence, 2013, WILEY.

Wednesday Aug 07, 2013
Is Your Organization Oozing Expertise?
Wednesday Aug 07, 2013
Wednesday Aug 07, 2013
The US Census Bureau estimates that 35 million Baby Boomers will be leaving the workplace over the next 10 years or so. If you have these individuals in key positions and lose them all at once, how will that impact your organization? Will they take key safety information with them or will they pass it on before they retire? The answer to that may depend on your planning and the results may be significant.
Many Boomers have been in the same position for years; some for their whole careers. They have knowledge that is not always captured in operating manuals or other documentation. They also have developed judgment about how to handle certain situations based on their years of observation and experience. How can you keep this knowledge and judgment when you lose the people?
One answer is a mentoring program in which experienced workers train new workers. New workers can be asked to capture the tips and procedures they learn and share them with the next generation of workers. Another approach is to have experienced workers hold formal training, develop training materials, or lead JSA or JSOP teams. Still other organizations hire key retirees as part-time consultants or on-call resources for the new employees.
Whatever your plan, your goal should be to spare your organization from oozing out needed expertise as the new generation of workers replace the old.
-Terry L. Mathis
Terry L. Mathis is the founder and CEO of ProAct Safety, an international safety and performance excellence firm. He is known for his dynamic presentations in the fields of behavioral and cultural safety, leadership, and operational performance, and is a regular speaker at ASSE, NSC, and numerous company and industry conferences. EHS Today listed Terry as a Safety Guru in ‘The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS’ in 2010, 2011 and 2012-2013. He has been a frequent contributor to industry magazines for over 15 years and is the coauthor of STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence, 2013, WILEY.

Monday Aug 05, 2013
301 - Accountability: A Dirty Word in Safety
Monday Aug 05, 2013
Monday Aug 05, 2013
Greetings everyone, this podcast recorded while in Prattville, Alabama. I’d like to share an article I wrote, published April 2013 in Occupational Health & Safety Magazine. It was titled, Accountability: A Dirty Word in Safety. The published article can either be found on the magazine’s website or under Insights at www.ProActSafety.com. I hope you enjoy the podcast this week. If you would like to download or play on demand our other podcasts, please visit the ProAct Safety’s podcast website at: http://www.safetycultureexcellence.com. If you would like access to archived podcasts (older than 90 days – dating back to January 2008) please visit www.ProActSafety.com/Store. For more detailed strategies to achieve and sustain excellence in performance and culture, pick up a copy of our book, STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence - http://proactsafety.com/insights/steps-to-safety-culture-excellence Have a great week! Shawn M. Galloway ProAct Safety, Inc

Wednesday Jul 31, 2013
Divided Management Creates Conflicting Priorities
Wednesday Jul 31, 2013
Wednesday Jul 31, 2013
Almost all jobs involve multiple priorities. If you have one boss who helps you balance these priorities, it becomes more and more clear how to do so. When workers see how their boss handles multiple priorities and get feedback on their own handling of them, they get a feel for the relative importance of each.
However, when different aspects of business are managed or supervised by different people, there will inevitably be a conflict of priorities. If one person supervises production, another supervises quality, and another supervises safety, there is not only a conflict of three priorities, but of three people. Workers now must juggle multiple priorities as well as multiple personalities and relationships. It is difficult to see the unity of priorities when the organization divides them into different departments and personnel. The big picture tends to be a divided screen with three pictures. The worker can only watch one at a time.
It is critically important for organizations to balance and unify, not divide priorities. Most organizations want safe, quality production, not three conflicting aspects of work. It is fine to have experts in each field who advise and serve as resources. It is not good to try to make such experts partial supervisors on the shop floor. One supervisor can better manage the whole process and unify the aspects of the process where workers view their role as doing the work, rather than refereeing their multiple bosses.
-Terry L. Mathis
Terry L. Mathis is the founder and CEO of ProAct Safety, an international safety and performance excellence firm. He is known for his dynamic presentations in the fields of behavioral and cultural safety, leadership, and operational performance, and is a regular speaker at ASSE, NSC, and numerous company and industry conferences. EHS Today listed Terry as a Safety Guru in ‘The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS’ in 2010, 2011 and 2012-2013. He has been a frequent contributor to industry magazines for over 15 years and is the coauthor of STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence, 2013, WILEY.

Wednesday Jul 17, 2013
The Bandwidth of Safety Management: How much can you do at once?
Wednesday Jul 17, 2013
Wednesday Jul 17, 2013
One of the most common mistakes organizations and safety professionals make is to try to do too much at once. It seems logical that more safety-related activities should create better safety awareness and thus result in improved safety performance. This is seldom what happens. Too much at once results in overload and also blocks internalization of important safety principles and practices. Trying to eat the elephant in one bite chokes the eater and aggravates the elephant.
Human attention, like the internet has limited bandwidth. It can only handle a certain amount of information at once. More is not better, it is lost. When organizations and safety professionals focus on specific and well prioritized improvement targets, the human attention machine works well. New precautions are understood and internalized. As the new safety habits and thinking progress, new targets can be added. The organization sees the elephant disappearing a bite at a time and that further motivates progress.
It requires discipline and clear thinking to realize that more is not better and that slower can actually be faster. But keeping safety efforts within the proper bandwidth of the human brain is the best and ultimately fastest path to safety excellence.
-Terry L. Mathis
Terry L. Mathis is the founder and CEO of ProAct Safety, an international safety and performance excellence firm. He is known for his dynamic presentations in the fields of behavioral and cultural safety, leadership, and operational performance, and is a regular speaker at ASSE, NSC, and numerous company and industry conferences. EHS Today listed Terry as a Safety Guru in ‘The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS’ in 2010, 2011 and 2012-2013. He has been a frequent contributor to industry magazines for over 15 years and is the coauthor of STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence, 2013, WILEY.

Monday Jul 15, 2013
298 - Who Says "Go"? Is Safety Led or Abdicated?
Monday Jul 15, 2013
Monday Jul 15, 2013
Greetings everyone, this podcast recorded while in Shreveport, LA. I’d like to share an article Terry Mathis wrote, published March 2013 in EHS Today Magazine. It was titled, Who Says "Go"? Is Safety Led or Abdicated? The published article can either be found on the magazine’s website or under Insights at www.ProActSafety.com. I hope you enjoy the podcast this week. If you would like to download or play on demand our other podcasts, please visit the ProAct Safety’s podcast website at: http://www.safetycultureexcellence.com. If you would like access to archived podcasts (older than 90 days – dating back to January 2008) please visit www.ProActSafety.com/Store. For more detailed strategies to achieve and sustain excellence in performance and culture, pick up a copy of our book, STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence - http://proactsafety.com/insights/steps-to-safety-culture-excellence Have a great week! Shawn M. Galloway ProAct Safety, Inc

Monday Jul 08, 2013
297 - Challenging the Goal of Safety
Monday Jul 08, 2013
Monday Jul 08, 2013
Greetings everyone, this podcast recorded while in Bastrop, Texas. I’d like to share an article I wrote that was published March 2013 in QHSE Focus Magazine. It was titled, Challenging the Goal of Safety. The published article can either be found on the magazine’s website or under Insights at www.ProActSafety.com. I hope you enjoy the podcast this week. If you would like to download or play on demand our other podcasts, please visit the ProAct Safety’s podcast website at: http://www.safetycultureexcellence.com. If you would like access to archived podcasts (older than 90 days – dating back to January 2008) please visit www.ProActSafety.com/Store. For more detailed strategies to achieve and sustain excellence in performance and culture, pick up a copy of our book, STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence - http://proactsafety.com/insights/steps-to-safety-culture-excellence Have a great week! Shawn M. Galloway ProAct Safety, Inc

Wednesday Jun 26, 2013
Do Your Accidents Have Special or Common Cause?
Wednesday Jun 26, 2013
Wednesday Jun 26, 2013
W. Edwards Deming explained a basic concept of manufacturing quality by elaborating on the cause of defects. He explained that some defects had special cause (i.e., some unusual event caused the defect to happen). Other defects happened due to causes that are built into the manufacturing processes itself. He called these common causes.
There is a debate among safety professionals these days about whether accidents are caused more by system issues or simply by human error. The simple fact is that it could be either and that neither is mutually exclusive. Your organization could be having accidents caused by either or both. Finding out the cause is critical during accident investigations and making the distinction between common and special causes can be very useful.
This dichotomy is less useful for fixing blame than it is for fixing problems. Special causes alert us to outside forces to guard against in the future. We can often extend our caution beyond the specific issue to other similar risks or situations. When a foreign object gets into a product, we can protect against that object but also explore what other objects could find their way into our processes and how they could do so. When a special outside issue impacts safety, we can use similar reasoning to increase our awareness and precautions against such risks.
Common causes can be more difficult to recognize because they hide within our systems and influence other actions and decisions that can directly lead to defects and/or accidents. However, it is critical to identify them because they will continue to influence risks until we see and address them. Even what looks like simple human error can be influenced by systems issues. This is one reason for always asking “why?” to find what may lie beyond worker decisions and actions.
Deming left us with a warning about finding out and classifying causes. He said that blame causes fear and that fear causes the hiding and skewing of information critical to understanding causation. We should seek first to understand and then take intelligent action based on that understanding.
-Terry L. Mathis
Terry L. Mathis is the founder and CEO of ProAct Safety, an international safety and performance excellence firm. He is known for his dynamic presentations in the fields of behavioral and cultural safety, leadership, and operational performance, and is a regular speaker at ASSE, NSC, and numerous company and industry conferences. EHS Today listed Terry as a Safety Guru in ‘The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS’ in 2010, 2011 and 2012-2013. He has been a frequent contributor to industry magazines for over 15 years and is the coauthor of STEPS to Safety Culture Excellence, 2013, WILEY.